Quotes of the Day

From three dead, wise men.

"Let us settle ourselves, and work and wedge our feet downward through the mud and slush of opinion, and prejudice, and tradition, and delusion, and appearance…till we come to a hard bottom and rocks in place, which we can call reality…. Be it life or death, we crave only reality. If we are really dying, let us hear the rattle in our throats and feel cold in the extremities; if we are alive, let us go about our business."

— Henry David Thoreau, on reality


"We dress our garden, eat our dinners, discuss the household with our wives, and these things make no impression, are forgotten next week; but in the solitude to which every man is always returning, he has a sanity and revelations, which in his passage into new worlds he will carry with him. Never mind the ridicule, never mind the defeat: up again, old heart!"

— Ralph Waldo Emerson, on solitude


"They stood there knowing each other well and each on the whole willing to accept the satisfaction of knowing as a compensation for the inconvenience — whatever it might be — of being known."

— Henry James, on two old lovers

Clinging to the Wreckage

Four months ago I wrote a post titled In Praise of Feeling Utterly Confused. I said confusion, self-doubt, feeling like you're treading just above water, deep uncertainties about things others seem so certain about: this is part of life, or at least part my life.

Andrew Sullivan has a thoughtful meditation on this topic on his blog. He reflects upon his internal angst and confusion by noting the failure of some of his most cherished institutions: the Catholic church, conservatism, and America.

After describing how those institutions have failed him, he ends:

Maybe this is adulthood finally arriving a little late: the knowledge that everything is flawed and you just need to get on with it. But a church perpetrating the rape and abuse of children through the power of its moral authority is not a flaw; it's a self-refutation. A movement betraying its core principles in office and then parading as a parody of purists is a form of anti-conservatism as I understand it. And a democratic country using torture to procure intelligence it can use to justify more torture, and prosecuting a war that never ends against an enemy that can never surrender: this, whatever else it is, is not America as its founders saw it. Again, it is a kind of self-refutation.

Where to go? What to do? You read me flounder every day; and you can find many less conflicted bloggers to read. Maybe I should take a break and live a less examined life for a while. Or maybe I should do what I am still doing: trying to make sense of where I belong, stay praying in a church that has sealed itself off from modernity, cling to a conservatism that begins to feel like a form of solipsism, hang on in the hope that America can reform itself and repair the world a little. I think, in fact, that this is obviously the right and only serious choice. Life is always a temporary and losing battle, an engagement with the deadliness of doing. It just feels deadlier than usual in these past few years of brutally unsentimental education.

Or maybe I should laugh more.

Teach us to care and not to care. Teach us to sit still.

I think there's some truth to the idea that "everything is flawed and you just need to get on with it."

As Martin Buber said, "The world is not comprehensible, but it is embraceable."

Focusing on the Fundamentals

Recently I was at a dinner with a few successful and experienced serial entrepreneurs and the discussion covered topics such as:

  • How to deal with failure
  • How to assess the caliber of a person you might want to hire
  • How to make sure candid feedback is flowing through the organization, especially from the lower ranks
  • Work-life-balance
  • How to listen to customers without listening too much

The following night I was at a dinner with a few first-time entrepreneurs, young and green. The discussion covered topics such as:

  • How to deal with failure
  • How to assess the caliber of a person you might want to hire
  • How to make sure candid feedback is flowing through the organization, especially from the lower ranks
  • Work-life-balance
  • How to listen to customers without listening too much

The questions and issues at both dinners were the same. What differed was the sophistication of the answers and the depth of the specific examples to buttress an opinion. But fundamentally, the experienced entrepreneurs were struggling with the exact same issues as the first-time entrepreneurs.

It's like in basketball. From third grade to the peaks of the NBA, coaches talk about the same stuff: footwork, ball-handling skills, boxing out, two handed passes, and so on and so forth. The fundamentals. You'll sometimes hear commentators talk about a struggling basketball team too enamored with fancy plays, scouting reports, or esoteric training regimens. The great John Wooden, they'll say, just coached the fundamentals over and over and over again.

In business the same is true, I think. Smart entrepreneurs, even as they accumulate experience and wins, still obsess over the key principles taught in Business 101: build stuff that people want, tell a story, hire amazing people, go after a big market, fail forward, iterate, and so on. They re-read Peter Drucker instead of the latest management guru. They still practice layups and free throws.

Oldies But Goodies From the Archives

New reader to this blog? Check out the Best of Ben page for some of my favorite posts from the past few years. You can also browse this blog by category:

Books || Business || Current Affairs || Entrepreneurship || Globalization || Health / Fitness || Life || Philosophy || Random || Religion / Spirituality || School / Education || Sports || Travel || Web/Tech || Writing || Humor || Relationships || Quotes

A handful of oldies but goodies from the archives:

Here’s an RSS feed to subscribe to my blog. You can also get posts emailed to you.

And thanks. Thanks for reading and commenting and emailing and helping me grow these past five years, and growing with me. I appreciate it more than you know. It’s a privilege, as Seth Godin has put it.

The Deadly Earnest Hunt for Identity

Leah Hager Cohen is a talented writer who I first discovered via her reviews in the New York Times Book Review. Her semi-frequent dispatches on her blog, Love as a Found Object, often cause me to pause and think. In her latest post she relays a story from her adolescence to make a point about the hunt for identity and authenticity, a familiar process for anyone "poised between childhood and adulthood." The two best paragraphs below:

What do we know of ourselves then, at the age when we cannot tear ourselves from the mirror, not out of vanity but out of the urgent search to identify, to see, oneself? Up until this time we have been who we are, c'est ça: matter of fact. And someday we will settle again, if less innocently, less righteously, into being squarely ourselves, no more and no less. But there is a time in the middle when we are ciphers to our own minds, when the robust vines of self-consciousness threaten to overwhelm the slighter tendrils of self.

This is when we are prone to spend hour upon hour trying on accents, attitudes, gestures, hats. Colors and moods. Props. We might practice holding wineglasses by the stem; beer bottles by the neck; cigarettes betwixt our fingers; a book in one hand, a hank of our own hair in the other. We try on scowls and sneers, we purse and pout, we analyze our smiles for traces of the beatific. We experiment with unwashed hair, unshaven legs, unmended rips, ungrammatical and ungracious pronouncements. We experiment with posture, with kindness, with the limits of humor and of despair. We do none of it to deceive; rather, we are researching in deadly earnest. We are taking astounded stock of our enormous range. And we are on the lookout all the while for what rings true, for the moments of recognition, for the rare and precious moments we sense home.

Whether or not you enjoy the company of reflective teens and young adults depends a lot on how stimulating you find this stage of life and the broad experimentation that Cohen points out. To retain sanity as a professor, for example, you must find thrill in engaging a constituency (students) doing all the above and more, if you're lucky, as they're also indulging intellectual enthusiasms: Nietzsche! Locke! Burke! Every day is a new hero, which is great except that appreciative hero-worship demands more than staccato attention.

Myself, when not engaged in my own exploring and confused wonderings along these lines, I tend to most enjoy people a few notches beyond this stage (age and stage are not always connected) where the sand beneath your feet is firmer not because you've answered all these questions or resolved all these self-doubts, but because the earnest, anxious, important, falsely urgent, and somewhat trite quest to "find yourself" and "figure out what I'm going to do with my life" has been replaced by a longer range view, one familiar with the real opportunities to reinvent yourself and your career over a lifetime, the surprising benefits of shade over light in some situations (ie, the joys of not knowing certain parts of you, the future, the world, etc), an appreciation for the permanence and fluidity of identity, and, bottom line, the acceptableness of "I don't know" to any number of meaty philosophical or practical questions.