Doc Searls Comment on My Post Yesterday

My post yesterday “Linking to Articles That Toot Your Own Horn” referenced Jeff Jarvis and Doc Searls by name. I don’t know either them and just started reading their blogs. I was surprised, then, when within a couple hours both had written in to me commenting on my post. Doc’s comment is excellent and contains some terrific links which I recommend checking out. Thanks, Doc, for such a thoughtful response. It’s below in its entirety.

Thanks to Technorati, PubSub and referer logs, a certain amount of b’logrolling is inevitable.

For what it’s worth, I try to read and link to blogs that are outside the circle of usual suspects, and to point praise, when it’s deserved, in unexpected directions. But what should one do when wanting to point to a post that also toots a horn in your direction? In my case, I either ignore or acknowledge the praise, and post anyway.

But your post has me thinking… Is there some kind of disclaimer protocol required? What’s not “transparent” in an environment where everybody’s alreay equipped to fact-check everybody else?

The way I see it, blogging at its best involves building new understandings of vexing issues. People often team up around that kind of effort, something like farmers do when raising a barn. If one builder high-fives another builder when they frame a particularly well-crafted door or floor together, is that a bad thing?

Perhaps it is, from the perspective of traditional journalism. There it is customary to write with with a tone of finality, from an objective distance, and to regard all forms of enthusiasm with a degree of suspicion. That’s one ideal, in any case. It’s also one that doesn’t work in the parts of the blogosphere where participants are trying to be constructive and not just objective, where they are busy making and changing minds, and not just digging up facts and issuing opinions.

In that last link, I point to a post by Jay Rosen in which he took an idea I tossed out and built something interesting and substantial case around it — far better than I ever could have done on my own.

My point, which just came to me…

Much of what we’re doing here amounts to teamwork. It’s not formal, or even conscious in many cases, but it does involve lots of “yes, and…” posting. Sometimes praise is involved. More often it isn’t. What matters is that we’re not doing it alone. And that we’re only beginning to understand what that’s about.

So thanks for making us think. Much appreciated.

2 comments on “Doc Searls Comment on My Post Yesterday
  • Hey, i heard this today 😉

    Two hunters are out in the woods when one of them collapses. He doesn’t seem to be breathing and his eyes are glazed.

    The other guy takes out his phone and calls the emergency services.
    He gasps: “My friend is dead! What can I do?”

    The operator says: “Calm down, I can help. First, let’s make sure he’s dead.”

    There is a silence, then a gunshot is heard. Back on the phone, the guy says: “OK, now what?”

Leave A Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *