The NYT had a hilarious article the other day about recent politicans’ gaffes and their hopeless attempts at damage control. Some good analysis of different kinds of apologies, too. And now, straight from Washington D.C.:
Senator Conrad Burns, Republican of Montana, said Wednesday that the United States confronts a “faceless enemy” of terrorists who “drive cabs in the daytime and kill at night.” Despite a hail of criticism on Thursday, Mr. Burns has not apologized for this remark as he did after complaining in July that a group of firefighters did not do a “goddamn thing” to stop a wildfire east of Billings.
Senator George Allen, Republican of Virginia, has been serially apologizing across Virginia since demeaning a man of Indian descent as “Macaca, or whatever his name is” at a campaign rally last month. Mr. Allen has been perhaps the most prodigious apologizer in what has been a spate of groveling across the political spectrum.
The contrite caucus includes Mayor C. Ray Nagin of New Orleans (who said he was “very sorry” after calling the site of the World Trade Center a “hole in the ground”); Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr., Democrat of Delaware, (who asked forgiveness after a C-Span microphone caught him saying “you cannot go to a 7-Eleven or a Dunkin’ Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent”); a Florida Republican Congressional candidate, Tramm Hudson (who might have sunk his campaign by saying that blacks were bad swimmers); and Gov. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts, a Republican, (after using the term “tar baby” not long after the White House spokesman, Tony Snow, deployed the same phrase, which some consider to be a racist epithet)….
Mr. Burns, the Montana senator, is both an accomplished apologizer and non-apologizer. He demonstrated as much in June when he joked that “the nice little Guatemalan man” working on his house might be an illegal immigrant. He has not apologized for the quip, as he once did after calling Arabs “ragheads.”
“I can self-destruct in one sentence,” Mr. Burns, a former livestock auctioneer, recently told supporters. “Sometimes in one word.”
6 comments on “When Politicians Leave Their Talking Points, It Gets Ugly”
This is great thanks for sharing it.
That’s a good article, but there’s an overbroad generalization in the headline for this post. There are many politicians who are able to speak highly articulately off-the-cuff, with Bill Clinton being the most recent presidential example. There are many examples on both sides of the blue-state/red-state divide who are quite articulate in unstructured settings.
Racists in particular have a hard time keeping their true feelings under wraps. Which is why it’s so important for politicians like that — and the GOP is full of them — to stay “on-message.”
sounds like you might be interested in the hotsoup.com that’s launching next month in time for the mid-term elections – seeking wider voices on culture, technology and, yes, politics. … think you’d enjoy the mix of team mates
On Clinton….it’s a trade off. Would you rather have someone who can keep his mouth zipped at appropriate times or someone who can keep his zipper up when he’s in a relationship?
Sorry, couldn’t resist. 🙂
I’d rather have an electorate and a media that cared more about the President’s foreign and domestic policies than his penis.
mei equiptment mei equiptment,352 civil affairs 352 civil affairs,employee development scenarios employee development scenarios,morley ias fire 6.15 morley ias fire 6.15,fuballverein vfl niederbieber fuballverein vfl niederbieber,cheap dog agility equiptment for sale cheap dog agility equiptment for sale,endymion porter william dobson endymion porter william dobson,porter farrell porter farrell,porter amp porter amp,blue collar sense of family volunteer blue collar sense of family volunteer,