Can the VC and Start-up World Find Time to Talk About Worldly Issues?

Comment of the Day by "Michael":

Ben– It’s funny… I have just started working in the whole tech start
up game. And my collegiate background was included majoring in
international studies and political science… I read a lot of your
writing geared towards VC and start up, and it makes me smile to see
someone with those interests ponder a question that I think about so
much (and never talk about working for a Bay area start up… WHO HAS
TIME FOR THAT?). 😉

Yep! You are one of many, I think, who loves their work in Silicon Valley, but isn’t given the opportunity to talk about the other issues of intellect affecting our world, and indeed, our work.

Stay tuned for a forthcoming announcement on what I’m doing about this.

How Labels Shape Our Attitudes Toward Violence

Another fascinating find from the world of cognitive science…

Link: How labels shape our attitudes toward violence.

Recent research by Vanderbilt University psychologist Jessica Giles found that both children and adults are more likely to have a negative, fixed view of people described with a noun, such as "evildoer" or "murderer," than a person described as "someone who does evil things" or "someone who commits murder."

The Fundamental Human Need for an Identity (and Religion)

In my Geography class today we had a very interesting discussion on the Israel and Palestine situation. Two of my Jewish friends who are both very involved and spent two months in Israel over the summer said that they would fight for the Israeli army over the American army. This shocked me. They are both very normal American citizens, but feel like their heritage and attachment to the religion supercedes loyalty to their home country.

It raised the larger question about the fundamental human need for an identity.

It is usually in adolescence when we fully develop our sense of self. It is a core human need to feel ownership of our self (our ego), take comfort in a unique identity, AND feel a sense of belonging to a larger something. The identity crisis is the quintessential high school quagmire, and it usually manifests itself with abrupt personality changes. Someone may come in one day and be a real loud-mouth, and a month later try on the introverted hat. Later on, this is called the mid-life crisis.

Religion is a very convenient way to fulfill this need. In many ways it dictates a value system and brings a rich culture and history to which you can feel a part. For me, I prefer to exercise my individuality by grappling with the big questions myself and developing a personal value system. In other words, my sense of belonging is to a worldview I continue to create. I have little interest in finding my roots or tracing my ethnicity. If my parents tried, I would have resisted a formal religious upbringing because it seems too tidy a way to resolve some of the most difficult questions. My approach is not necessarily better than the one of my friends, but it highlights a divergence in life philosophy.

What are your thoughts?

"I'll Do It But Only If You Help Me Do It"

The PledgeBank is an awesome site that gives people the confidence of numbers.

The idea’s simple. Make a pledge, any pledge, conditional on a number of other people joining in.

Pledges can be symmetrical (everyone does the same thing)…

    "I will march on the White House in protest at X, if 1,000 people will join me."

    "I will paint my car bright yellow, if 200 people in my city will pledge the same."

…or a-symmetrical (you offer more than you ask from others.)

    "I will take $100,000 worth of sleeping bags to Pakistani earthquake victims if 5 people will join me to help distribute them…"

    "I will host free pizza at 10pm on my street, if a minimum of 30 people pledge to show up."

The reason this is brilliant is that so many people are reluctant to get involved in social change issues because they feel like their one voice won’t do jack. This overcomes that.

(Hat tip: TEDblog)

The Road Ahead: Religion, Technology, and Politics

Time magazine ran an interesting roundtable discussion with Malcolm Gladwell, David Brooks, Esther Dyson, and Moby where they covered everything from politics to religion to the next generation. It’s worth the few minutes. I love these kinds of discussions – varied in topic and focused around trends and culture.

(Hat tip: Paul Kedrosky)