Friendships in the Cyber Age

A reader of my post on the networks and connections of today’s grads points me to this brief but highly interesting article on friendship in the cyber-age. It starts by reviewing Aristotle:

In Book VIII of his Nichomachean Ethics, Aristotle categorizes three different types of friendship: friendships of utility, friendships of pleasure, and friendships of the good. Friendships of utility are those where people are on cordial terms primarily because each person benefits from the other in some way. Business partnerships, relationships among co-workers, and classmate connections are examples. Friendships of pleasure are those where individuals seek out each other’s company because of the joy it brings. Passionate love affairs, people associating with each other due to belonging to the same hobby organization, and fishing buddies fall into this category. Most important of all are friendships of the good. These are friendships based upon mutual respect, admiration for each other’s virtues, and a strong desire to aid and assist the other person because one recognizes their essential goodness.

The author goes on to discuss each category and how the web and email play a role in the forming and maintaining of such a relationship. He’s optimistic — people tend to dwell on the negative when it comes to the internet and its effect on friendships, he says, but in the end it is more a force for good.

Off to Russia and Welcome New Readers

I’m taking off today to Ukraine and Russia. I’ll be speaking in Odessa, Ukraine and then onto Kiev, Moscow, and St. Petersburg. Blogging and email will be light. I’m looking forward to cracking open The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution, 1763-1789 by Robert Middlekauff on the flight to Frankfurt — it looks excellent.

If you’re new to this blog, here’s my "Best Of" and welcome page, here’s a link to my book, here’s the RSS feed, here’s my email address.

A New Low for Political Correctness On Campus

We’ve hit a new low for political correctness on campus. The University of Michigan LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual, Transgendered) office has determined that its name offends a boatload of excluded people. Excerpt from post:

And guess what? The name “Office of LGBT Affairs” oppresses straight people too, a.ka. “allies.” So they’re going to change the name. Great! So call a meeting, toss some ideas around, and pick a new name. Easy! Ah, no. That’s not the way it works in the LGBTQIALMNOP community. Everyone has to be included, every voice has to be heard, input welcomed, feelings honored, etc., etc., etc. And a respectful, inclusive process takes time. How much time?

Three years.

That’s not a typo. They devoted three years to getting due input and coming up with a more inclusive name.

And the wheels of higher ed keep spinning…

(hat tip: Andrew Sullivan)