I just read a must-read article called The Framing Wars, the cover story in yesterday’s NYTimes Magazine. It is an enormously informative, entertaining, and instructive piece that looks inside the Democratic struggle to match the art that Republicans have mastered: using language to frame the debate to suit one’s point of view. The excellent writer Matt Bai implicitly makes points about the rhetorical devices of framing (and the associated cognitive/emotional causes of how we pick which side of the debate to be on) that appeal to anyone who spends some portion of their day trying to convince someone of something. It’s long, so print and read (even if you’re squeezed tight into a train, like I was). I find these longer, quasi-news/quasi-analysis pieces so much stronger than the daily he-said she-said politics coverage of most rags – especially since the writer isn’t afraid to bring his or her own voice and opinion into the piece.
Get Infrequent Email Updates
- RT @ByRosenberg: Here's the list of taxpayer incentives Amazon got from its HQ2 tour, settling on its biggest East Coast offices now… https://t.co/c1656cMXwo, 18 hours ago
- RT @NareshOmega: Ambition drives us all & yet these very ambitions can keep us unhappy. So how do we balance Ambition & Happiness?… https://t.co/X4zx4Q98xf, 19 hours ago
- RT @antoniogm: This is an Australian senator replying to a constituent, and this service is still free. We live in the best of a… https://t.co/5SZTnwBZaV, Nov 13
Subscribe to BlogGet posts sent to you by email when they're published.